the kind of annotation information intended to help educators deploy effective strategies to assess learning an indication that resource content may have: (1) factual (e.g. not just scientific) errors, (2) conflicts with generally accepted scientific thought, (3) a self-promoting emphasis or (4) a political, social or religious agenda information about the effectiveness of a resource with a specific audience a remark, explanation, advice, opinion, attitude, fact, proposed change, question or additional resource information a summary of evaluative information (qualitative or quantitative) that may describe the strengths, weaknesses, pedagogical effectiveness, best uses for or general characteristics of a resource an indication that the resource meets, supports or aligns with an educational standard, that is, a level of achievement determined by a professional group to which learners are expected to aspire too a description or link to another resource that illustrates the resource content in a demonstrative way information intended to help educators anticipate, detect and overcome common student misconceptions numerical information about a resource a formal or informal evaluation of a resource a reference to another resource information intended to help educators foster a student skill needed for optimal resource use information for using or modifying the resource within teaching or learning environments Choose an annotation type term. If multiple annotations need to be associated with a resource, make multiple annotation metadata records. When providing a rating, use the annotation type of Review. required 1 1 string controlled vocabulary Teaching tip, Review, Comment